Review Desk engineering document review
ENNL
Demo by PitchAI · synthetic data only - fictional project, fictional companies, no real project documentsNot a product of any project owner. The engineer decides; the agents propose.
AI-supported document review · live demo

Agents check every vendor document against every applicable requirement. Engineers decide.

Upload Word, PDF, Excel and AutoCAD files (DXF and DWG, including P&IDs) with a requirements register. Watch the agents read the documents, open the drawings, select the applicable requirements and report findings with exact citations. Approve or reject each finding, then export the comment-resolution sheet. Upload a revision and see what was resolved.

Open a finished review Upload your own files

Starting the sample package runs the agents live (about 2-3 minutes). No time? Open the finished reference review, its revision comparison or a replay of the agents' run.

10 sample documents (Word, PDF, Excel, DXF, DWG) 152 requirements 39 planted non-conformities
  1. 01
    ReadWord, PDF and Excel readers; CAD reader opens DXF and DWG: layers, text, blocks, title block, dimensions, tag lists.
  2. 02
    Select applicable requirementsApplicability matrix per document type and discipline; agents confirm per requirement, with the reason visible.
  3. 03
    CheckDeterministic rules for values, tags and cross-references; discipline agents for requirements that need reading and judgement.
  4. 04
    VerifyEvery quote checked by code against the source; an independent second opinion; duplicates merged.
  5. 05
    Engineer decides, then exportApprove, reject or re-prioritise each finding; only approved findings go into the comment sheet.
  6. 06
    RevisionsRevision B: resolved, still open and new findings, with the changed passages.

Last measured run on the sample package

Benchmark details →
100%
recall: planted non-conformities found (36/36)
92%
precision: findings that hit a planted defect
6/6
fixes in revision B recognised as resolved
€0.04
model cost per sample document at reference rate
40
findings for the engineer, revision A

Measured on synthetic documents written by PitchAI with known, planted defects. Real-world quality is measured in a pilot on documents engineers have already reviewed.

What the sample package contains

A fictional CO2 compressor station and trunkline: vendor and EPC documents in revision A, three of them revised in revision B, and a register of 152 requirements in English and Dutch.

XLSX
NCT-INS-DS-0101
Instrument datasheet - Pressure transmitters, compressor discharge
datasheet · rev B
DOCX
NCT-MEC-SP-0201
Vendor technical specification - Trunkline ball valves
specification
DXF
NCT-PRC-PID-0301
P&ID - Compressor discharge and pig launcher
P&ID · rev B
DWG
NCT-PRC-PID-0302
P&ID - Landfall valve station
P&ID
XLSX
NCT-PIP-LL-0401
Line list - Compressor station and trunkline
line list
XLSX
NCT-INS-IL-0501
Instrument index - Compressor station and landfall
instrument index
PDF
NCT-PIP-CA-0601
Wall thickness calculation - 32-inch trunkline
calculation
DOCX
NCT-MEC-PR-0701
Afpersprocedure onshore leidingsectie (hydrotest procedure)
procedure · rev B
DXF
NCT-CIV-DW-0801
Plot plan - Compressor station
layout drawing
PDF
NCT-QAC-ITP-0901
Inspection and test plan - Pipeline construction
inspection and test plan

Recent packages and runs

RunPackageRoundStatus
c9e39d9032doneopen →
9d8ce9bb31doneopen →
e88a0d3922doneopen →
0ca84f1021doneopen →
bca518fc12doneopen →
49c882e111doneopen →

How this maps to the consultation

Review and traceabilityevery finding cites document, location, quote, requirement ID and clause
Applicability of referencesmatrix + agent reason shown per finding
Human controlapprove / reject / re-prioritise, logged
DrawingsDXF and DWG: title block, tags, line numbers, dimensions; P&ID vs instrument index and line list
Revisionsresolved / still open / new, changed passages
Output and workflowcomment-resolution sheet (Excel, CSV)
Quality and costprecision/recall benchmark; tokens and cost per document